教師授課計劃表(學生課表查詢部份)

檔案產生時間：2018/1/19 上午 09:04:46
本表如有異動，於4小時內自動更新

一、課程基本資料 Course Information

科目名稱 Course Title：
(中文)轉型正義專題
(英文)A SEMINAR ON TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE

開課學期 Semester：106學年度第1學期
開課班級 Class：哲碩一

授課教師 Instructor：陳瑤華 CHEN, JAU-HWA

科目代碼 Course Code：MPH84201

單全學期 Semester/Year：單

分組組別 Section：

人數限制 Class Size：

必選修別 Required/Elective：選

學分數 Credit(s)：3

星期節次 Day/Session：一567　

前次異動時間 Time Last Edited：106年09月07日12時34分

哲學系(碩士班)基本能力指標 Basic Ability Index

編號 Code	指標名稱 Basic Ability Index	本科目對應之指標 Correspondent Index	達成該項基本能力之考評方式 Methods Of Evaluating This Ability
1	邏輯論証與批判思考 Proficiency in logical and critical thinking.	●	》出缺席狀況》課堂討論與表現》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式) 》作業成績》外文閱讀
2	道德推理與倫理實踐 Ability to make good moral reasoning and being well-disposed to put morality into practice.	●	》出缺席狀況》課堂討論與表現》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式) 》作業成績》外文閱讀
3	發展自我與終極關懷 Developing one’s self and proper sensitivity to and concern with ultimate issues in human’s life.
4	社會與多元文化關懷 Being sensitive to social problems and to issues related to multi-cultures.
5	哲學應用與創意思考 Good at applying philosophy to practical matters and to creative endeavors.	●	》出缺席狀況》課堂討論與表現》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式) 》作業成績
6	哲學史觀與哲學主題詮釋 Both historically well-informed and interpretatively competent with respective to issues or topics in philosophy.
7	表達與論述 Good communicative and argumentative skills.	●	》出缺席狀況》課堂討論與表現》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式) 》作業成績

二、指定教科書及參考資料 Textbooks and Reference
(請修課同學遵守智慧財產權，不得非法影印)

●指定教科書 Required Texts
1. Arthur, Paige, (2009), “How ‘Transitions’ Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice” in Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009): 321-367.
2. Sisson, J. (2010), “A Conceptual Framework for Dealing with the Past”, in Politorbis, Nr. 50-3/2010, 11-16. (http://www.dplf.org/sites/default/files/1292518783.pdf )
3. Méndez, Juan E. (1997), “Accountability for Past Abuses”, Human Rights Quarterly, 19: 255–282.
4. 陳俊宏（2015）:〈聯合國處理轉型正義原則〉，收錄於：《記憶與遺忘的鬥爭》，台北：衛城出版社，143-160。
5. Crowe, David M. (2014), War Crime, Genocide, and Justice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 151-282. (Ch. 6紐倫堡軍事審判，Ch. 7 東京軍事審判，以及Ch. 8亞洲軍事審判)
6. Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 30-103.
7. Crenzel, Emilio, "From judicial truth to historical knowledge: The disappearance of persons in Argentina", in: African Yearbook of Rhetoric, 2012 vol. 3 p. 53 – 64.
(http://www.africanrhetoric.org/pdf/09_AYOR%203,2%20Crenzel.pdf )
8. González Morales, F. (2012), “The progressive development of the international law of transitional justice: the role of the Inter-American system”, in: Almqvist, Jessica; Esposito, Carlos, The Role of Courts in Transitional Justice, London/NY, 31-55.
9. Rettig, Max (2008), “Gacaca: Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation in Post-conflict Rwanda?” African Studies Review 51, 3: 25-50.
10. Hayner, Priscilla B. (2006) “Truth commissions: a schematic overview”, in International Review of the Red Cross, Vol, 88 Nº 862, pp. 295-310.
11. Hayner, Priscilla B. (2002), Unspeakable Truth (2nd ed.), New York and London: Routledge.
12. Amnesty International (2010), Commissioning justice Truth commissions and criminal justice, in: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/POL30/004/2010
13. Ferstman, Carla (2010), “Reparation As Prevention: Considering the law and practice of orders for cessation and guarantees of non-repetition in torture cases”, in: Preventing Torture in the 21st Century: Monitoring In Europe Two Decades On, Monitoring Globally Two Years On, 2010 Special Issue of the Essex Human Rights Review [http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V6N2/Ferstman.pdf]
14. Satz, D. (2012), “Counting the Wrongs of the Past: The role of Compensation”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 129-150.
15. Grodsky, B.K. (2010), The Cost of Justice, Norte Dame: University of Norte Dame, 58-74.
16. David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 17-43.
17. Human Rights Watch (1996), Shattered Lives: Sexual violence During the Rwandan Genocide and its Aftermath, New York: Human Rights Watch.
18. Buckley-Zistel, S. and Zolko, M. (2011), “Introduction in Transitional Justice”, in Gender in Transitional Justice, New York: Macmillan, 1-36.
19. Grud, K. and Manjoo, R. (2010), “Challenging Hegemonic Understanding of Human Rights Violations in the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission: The Need for a New Narrative”, in Women, War and Violence, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 76-95.
20. Keaney-Mischel, C. (2010), “A Gender Approach for Policy in UN Peacekeeping Mission”, in Women, War and Violence, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 96-115.
21. 藍適齊 : ﹤跨越國境的戰爭責任：以二戰後盟國對台灣籍戰犯的審判為例﹥，請見：https://sites.google.com/site/tokuntaichianchengsu1/home/12
22. 陳俊宏（2015）〈檢視台灣轉型正義之路〉，《新世紀文教論壇》，臺北：新世紀文教基金會，請見：http://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/ttforum/71/71-05.pdf
23. 第三屆模擬憲法法庭判決書：
https://sites.google.com/site/civilconstitutionalcourt/judgement/scc45

●參考書資料暨網路資源 Reference Books and Online Resources
1. Naomi Roht-Arriaza (2006) “The new landscape of transitional justice”, in: Transitional Justice in 21. Century, Cambridge & Malden: Polity, 1-16.
2. Teitel, Ruti (2003), “Transitional Justice Genealogy”, in Harvard human rights journal Harvard human rights journal, Vol. 16, No. spring, 69-94.
3. Webber, J. (2012), “Forms of Transitional Justice”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 98-128.
4. Report of the UN Secretary General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies (S/2004/616), p. 9. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/395/29/PDF/N0439529.pdf?OpenElement
5. General Assembly. 2006. Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. A/RES/60/147. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/496/42/PDF/N0549642.pdf?OpenElement
6. Linton, Suzannah (ed, 2013), Hong Kong’s War Crimes Trials, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Priemel, Kim C. and Stiller, A. (ed. 2012), Reassessing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
8. Huhle, Rainer, (Ed.) (2007), From Nuremberg to The Hague, booklet and itinerary exposition on behalf of the German Ministry of Foreign Relations, Nuremberg, in: http://www.von-nuernberg-nach-den-haag.de/en/
9. Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 151-172.
10. Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the Human Rights Council on prosecutorial prioritization strategies in the aftermath of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, A/HRC/27/56, 2014.
11. Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 128-150.
12. Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the Human Rights Council on selected challenges faced by truth commissions in transitional periods and responses to strengthen the effectiveness of those mechanisms in addressing gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, A/HRC/24/42, 2013.
13. Leebaw, B. (2011), Judging State-Sponsored violence: Imagining Political Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 119-144.
14. Vernule, A. (2012), “Reparations as Rough Justice”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 151-165.
15. Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the General Assembly on reparations for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law. A/69/518, 2014.
16. United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 60/147, UN Doc. A/RES/60/147 (2005), 16 December 2005, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law.
17. David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 44-92.
18. Mageza-Barthel (2011), “Asserting their Presence! Women Quest for Transitional Justice in Post-Genocide Rwandan”, in Gender in Transitional Justice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 163-190.
19. Chappel, L. (2011), The Role of ICC in Transitional Gender Justice: Capacity and Limitation”, in Gender in Transitional Justice, New York: Macmillan, 37-58.
20. 白色恐怖受難者口述歷史：國家人權博物館：http://www.nhrm.gov.tw/movielist?uid=927
21. 第三屆模擬憲法法庭判實況轉播

三、教學目標 Objectives

這門課主要介紹轉型正義的理論，包括全球轉型工程、實踐、反思及規範。課程主要探討以下問題：
什麼是轉型的正義？
為什麼會以「轉型」及「正義」兩個概念來命名「該如何處理及反思過去政權的人權侵害」？
轉型正義的工程及形式有哪些？
各國轉型正義的實踐有哪些？
對轉型正義的時間有哪些批評性的反思？
聯合國有何相關轉型正義的準則和規範？
為什麼轉型正義必須關注性別及原住民的議題？
臺灣的轉型正義有哪些問題？
藉由這些問題的討論來釐清：正義、人權、可咎責性、真相、有罪不罰、和解、賠償、性暴力等概念在轉型正義方面的應用與修正。

This seminar will introduce the theories of transitional justice, including global transitional justice mechanisms, practices, critical reflections and norms. Following questions are matter for the seminar:
What is "transitional justice"?
Why the two terms, "transitional" and "justice" are combined to address atrocities and mass human rights violations of the past regimes?
What are forms or practices of transitional justice?
What are norms and critical judgments of the practices?
Why gender and indigenous issues relevant to transitional justice?
What are problems of Taiwan's seeking justice for the 228 Incident and White Terror?following Following concepts will be clarified regarding transitional justice readings and discussions: justice, human rights, accountability, truth, impunity, reconciliation, compensation.

四、課程內容 Course Description

●整體敘述 Overall Description
課程分為十三週進行，從「轉型正義」概念源起開始介紹、轉型正義工程、國際、國內審判、真相委員會、賠償、除垢等議題。除此之外，還包括國際建立的轉型正義準則、女性與轉型正義、台灣與轉型正義等議題之文獻探討。臺灣轉型正義部分則已第三屆模擬憲法法庭為核心，探討台灣轉型正義之可能政治工程。

●分週敘述 Weekly Schedule

週次 Wk	日期 Date	課程內容 Content	備註 Note
1	9/18	課程介紹：主題與題目認領
2	9/25	第一週什麼是「轉型正義」？ Arthur, Paige, (2009), “How ‘Transitions’ Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice” in Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009): 321-367. 參考資料： Naomi Roht-Arriaza (2006) “The new landscape of transitional justice”, in: Transitional Justice in 21. Century, Cambridge & Malden: Polity, 1-16. Teitel, Ruti (2003), “Transitional Justice Genealogy”, in Harvard human rights journal Harvard human rights journal, Vol. 16, No. spring, 69-94.
3	10/2	第二週轉型正義的政治工程 Sisson, J. (2010), A Conceptual Framework for Dealing with the Past, in Politorbis, Nr. 50-3/2010, 11-16. (http://www.dplf.org/sites/default/files/1292518783.pdf ) Méndez, Juan E. (1997), “Accountability for Past Abuses”, Human Rights Quarterly 19: 255–282. 陳俊宏（2015）:聯合國處理轉型正義原則，收錄於：記憶與遺忘的鬥爭，台北：衛城出版社，143-160。參考資料： Webber, J. (2012), “Forms of Transitional Justice”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 98-128. Report of the UN Secretary General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies (S/2004/616), p. 9. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/395/29/PDF/N0439529.pdf?OpenElement General Assembly. 2006. Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. A/RES/60/147. Available at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/496/42/PDF/N0549642.pdf?OpenElement
4	10/9	放假
5	10/16	第三週二戰後國際軍事審判 Crowe, David M. (2014), War Crime, Genocide, and Justice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 151-282. (Ch. 6紐倫堡軍事審判，Ch. 7 東京軍事審判，以及Ch. 8亞洲軍事審判) 參考資料： Linton, Suzannah (ed, 2013), Hong Kong’s War Crimes Trials, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Priemel, Kim C. and Stiller, A. (ed. 2012), Reassessing the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
6	10/23	第四週從紐倫堡到海牙：國際審判的發展 Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 30-103. 參考資料 Huhle, Rainer, (Ed.) (2007), From Nuremberg to The Hague, booklet and itinerary exposition on behalf of the German Ministry of Foreign Relations, Nuremberg, in: http://www.von-nuernberg-nach-den-haag.de/en/
7	10/30	第五週國內審判 Crenzel, Emilio, "From judicial truth to historical knowledge: The disappearance of persons in Argentina", in: African Yearbook of Rhetoric, 2012 vol. 3 p. 53 – 64. (http://www.africanrhetoric.org/pdf/09_AYOR%203,2%20Crenzel.pdf ) González Morales, F. (2012), “The progressive development of the international law of transitional justice: the role of the Inter-American system”, in: Almqvist, Jessica; Esposito, Carlos, The Role of Courts in Transitional Justice, London/NY, 31-55. Rettig, Max (2008), “Gacaca: Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation in Post-conflict Rwanda?” African Studies Review 51, 3: 25-50. 參考資料： Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 151-172. Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the Human Rights Council on prosecutorial prioritization strategies in the aftermath of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, A/HRC/27/56, 2014.
8	11/6	第六週真相委員會 Hayner, Priscilla B. (2006) “Truth commissions: a schematic overview”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol, 88 Nº 862, pp. 295-310. Hayner, Priscilla B. (2002), Unspeakable Truth (2nd ed.), New York and London: Routledge, 7-26. Amnesty International (2010), Commissioning justice Truth commissions and criminal justice, in: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/POL30/004/2010 參考資料： Kerr, R. & Mobekk, E. (2007) Peace and Justice: Seeking Accountability After War. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 128-150.
9	11/13	第七週真相委員會的功能 Hayner, Priscilla B. (2002), Unspeakable Truth (2nd ed.), New York and London: Routledge, 75-84; 121-144. 參考資料： Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the Human Rights Council on selected challenges faced by truth commissions in transitional periods and responses to strengthen the effectiveness of those mechanisms in addressing gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, A/HRC/24/42, 2013.
10	11/20	第八週真相委員會與審判的關係 Hayner, Priscilla B. (2002), Unspeakable Truth (2nd ed.), New York and London: Routledge, 75-84; 121-144. 參考資料： Leebaw, B. (2011), Judging State-Sponsored violence, Imagining Political Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 119-144.
11	11/27	第九週賠償 Ferstman, Carla (2010), “Reparation As Prevention: Considering the law and practice of orders for cessation and guarantees of non-repetition in torture cases”, in: Preventing Torture in the 21st Century: Monitoring In Europe Two Decades On, Monitoring Globally Two Years On, 2010 Special Issue of the Essex Human Rights Review [http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V6N2/Ferstman.pdf] Satz, D. (2012), “Counting the Wrongs of the Past: The role of Compensation”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 129-150. 參考資料： Vernule, A. (2012), “Reparations as Rough Justice”, in Transitional Justice, New York: NTU Press, 151-165. Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, Report to the General Assembly on reparations for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law. A/69/518, 2014. United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 60/147, UN Doc. A/RES/60/147 (2005), 16 December 2005, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law.
12	12/4	第十週除垢 Grodsky, B.K. (2010), The Cost of Justice, Norte Dame: University of Norte Dame, 58-74. David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 17-43. 參考資料： David, R. (2011), Lustration and Transitional Justice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 44-92.
13	12/11	第十一週性暴力與轉型正義 Human Rights Watch (1996), Shattered Lives: Sexual violence During the Rwandan Genocide and its Aftermath, New York: Human Rights Watch. Buckley-Zistel, S. and Zolko, M. (2011), “Introduction in Transitional Justice, in Gender in Transitional Justice”, New York: Macmillan, 1-36. 參考資料： Mageza-Barthel (2011), “Asserting their Presence! Women Quest for Transitional Justice in Post-Genocide Rwandan”, in Gender in Transitional Justice, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 163-190.
14	12/18	第十一週性別與轉型正義 Grud, K. and Manjoo, R. (2010), “Challenging Hegemonic Understanding of Human Rights Violations in the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission: The Need for a New Narrative”, in Women, War and Violence, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 76-95. Keaney-Mischel, C. (2010), “A Gender Approach for Policy in UN Peacekeeping Mission”, in Women, War and Violence, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 96-115. 參考資料： Chappel, L. (2011), The Role of ICC in Transitional Gender Justice: Capacity and Limitation, in Gender in Transitional Justice”, New York: Macmillan, 37-58.
15	12/25	放假
16	1/1	放假
17	1/8	第十二週臺灣的轉型正義之路藍適齊 : 跨越國境的戰爭責任：以二戰後盟國對台灣籍戰犯的審判為例，請見：https://sites.google.com/site/tokuntaichianchengsu1/home/12 陳俊宏（2015）檢視台灣轉型正義之路，台北：新世紀文教基金會 http://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/ttforum/71/71-05.pdf 參考資料：白色恐怖受難者口述歷史：國家人權博物館：http://www.nhrm.gov.tw/movielist?uid=927
18	1/15	第十三週第三屆模擬憲法法庭判決書第三屆模擬憲法法庭判決書： https://sites.google.com/site/civilconstitutionalcourt/judgement/scc45 參考資料：第三屆模擬憲法法庭判實況轉播

五、考評及成績核算方式 Grading

配分項目 Items	次數 Times	配分比率 Percentage	配分標準說明 Grading Description
出席	16	20%	包含上課提問，參與討論及回應同學問題
報告	3	40%	三次口頭報告+書面問題討論各佔10% X 3= 30% 期末報告大綱佔10%
期末報告	1	40%
配分比率加總		100%

六、授課教師課業輔導時間和聯絡方式 Office Hours And Contact Info

●課業輔導時間 Office Hour
三56
四56

●聯絡方式 Contact Info

研究室地點 Office：D804	EMAIL：jhchen@scu.edu.tw
聯絡電話 Tel：6232	其他 Others：

七、教學助理聯絡方式 TA’s Contact Info

教學助理姓名 Name

連絡電話 Tel

其他 Others

八、建議先修課程 Suggested Prerequisite Course

九、課程其他要求 Other Requirements

十、學校教材上網及教師個人網址 University’s Web Portal And Teacher's Website

學校教材上網網址 University’s Teaching Material Portal：
東吳大學Moodle數位平台：http://isee.scu.edu.tw

教師個人網址 Teacher's Website：

其他 Others：

十一、計畫表公布後異動說明 Changes Made After Posting Syllabus

東吳大學教師授課計劃表