東吳大學教師授課計劃表

檔案產生時間:2020/2/10 下午 04:12:28
本表如有異動,於4小時內自動更新
一、課程基本資料 Course Information
科目名稱 Course Title:
(中文)人權哲學專題
(英文)THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUMAN RIGHTS
開課學期 Semester:108學年度第1學期
開課班級 Class:人權碩一
授課教師 Instructor:陳瑤華 CHEN, JAU-HWA
科目代碼 Course Code:MHR51001 單全學期 Semester/Year:單 分組組別 Section:
人數限制 Class Size: 必選修別 Required/Elective:必 學分數 Credit(s):3
星期節次 Day/Session: 一567  前次異動時間 Time Last Edited:108年10月03日19時29分
人權碩士學位學程(碩士班)基本能力指標 Basic Ability Index
編號
Code
指標名稱
Basic Ability Index
本科目對應之指標
Correspondent Index
達成該項基本能力之考評方式
Methods Of Evaluating This Ability
1人權專業知識培養
Development of human rights knowledge.
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
》實作(含分組演練/合作等)
》資料蒐集與分析
》外文閱讀
2人權專業學術研究之能力
Ability to conduct human rights research.
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
》展演
》實作(含分組演練/合作等)
》資料蒐集與分析
》外文閱讀
3人權理論和議題之論述、批判與政策規劃能力
Ability to discourse, criticize and to do policy planning on human rights theories and issues.
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
》展演
》實作(含分組演練/合作等)
》資料蒐集與分析
》外文閱讀
4從事人權實務工作之專業能力
Ability to dedicate oneself to human rights practices.
》課堂討論與表現
》報告(含個人或小組、口頭或書面、專題、訪問、觀察等形式)
》作業成績
》實作(含分組演練/合作等)
》資料蒐集與分析
》外文閱讀
》學習綜合表現
二、指定教科書及參考資料 Textbooks and Reference
(請修課同學遵守智慧財產權,不得非法影印)
●指定教科書 Required Texts
Biletzki, Anat(2019): the Philosophy of Human Rights, Rouledge.
Patrick Hayden (ed.) (2001), The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House.
Morton E. Winston (ed.) (1989), The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company.
Avonius, L. and Kingsbury, D. (ed.) (2008), Human Rights in Asia, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
陳瑤華 (二版)(2015),《人權不是舶來品》,五南。
Stamos, David N. (2013), The Myth of Universal Human Rights, Rouledge, 27-47.
Paul Gordon Lauren, The Evolution of International Human Rights (中譯本:韋伯出版社)
Mary Ann Glendon (2001), A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (New York: Random House, 2001)
Nussbaum Martha(2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Harvard University Press(中譯本:韋伯出版社)
An-Na'im Abdullahi Ahmed(ed)(1992) Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press(中譯本:韋伯出版社)

●參考書資料暨網路資源 Reference Books and Online Resources
Donnelly, Jack (2003), Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (2nd), Cornell Universlity Press.
Steiner, Henry J. and Philip Alston (2008), International Human Rights in Context. Law, Politics, Morals. Oxford University Press.
Nickel, James (2006), Making Sense of Human Rights (2nd),Backwell Publishing.
Cudd Ann (2006), Analyzing Oppression, Oxford University Press.
Young, Iris (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press.
Sontag, Susan (2003), Regarding the Pain of Others. Picador: New York.
Beitz Charles (2009), The Idea of Human Rights, Oxford University Press.
Griffin,James (2008), On Human Rights, Oxford University Press.
沉默串謀者: 日常生活中的緘默與縱容
國際特赦組織台灣總會、財團法人法律扶助基金會; (2010); 回家路:天災與人權國際準則實用手冊
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ human rights/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/Locke, John/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal rights/
http://www.iep.utm.edu/
以下有幾個重要人權團體以及提供重要人權訊息的網站可供參考
東吳大學張佛泉人權中心:http://www.scu.edu.tw/hr/
聯合國人權事務: http://www.un.org/chinese/hr/
台灣人權促進會: http://www.tahr.org.tw/
中國人權協會: http://www.cahr.org.tw/
國際特赦組織台灣總會: http://www.aitaiwan.org.tw/htm/index-c.htm
香港大學人權資源Human Rights Portal: http://www.law.hku.hk/hrportal/
婦女聯合網: http://www.womenweb.org.tw/
婦女新知基金會: http://www.awakening.org.tw/
苦勞網: http://www.coolloud.org.tw/
人權教育資訊網: http://www.hre.edu.tw/report/
廢除死刑推動聯盟: http://deathpenalty.org.tw/main.php
國際邊緣: http://intermargins.net/


三、教學目標 Objectives
本課程主要目的在於介紹人權的哲學基礎及其批判。期望透過課程的安排,使同學對於人權理念的起源、發展以及遭遇的挑戰,有一概括性的了解。本學期將集中於社會不正義現象的理解,尤其是關於壓制與支配關係的討論,藉以分析人權語彙的功用及其限制。因此在課程設計上,將會探究各種人權理論的哲學基礎,各種人權理論遭遇的批評與挑戰,以及當前人權理論面對不同結構不正義的解決途徑及其困境等等。因此本課程的教學目標為協助同學:

(a) 理解人權概念的基本意涵;

(b) 理解支持與反對人權概念的不同主張;

(c) 分析當代不同人權理論的優劣

(d) 分析人權概念在處理壓制與支配議題中的解釋與應用

The main purpose of this course is to introduce the philosophical foundation of Human Rights and its criticism. Through the arrangement of this course, we anticipate students would understand the origin, development and challenges of human rights concepts. This semester will focus on social injustice, especially on the discussion of oppression and dominant relationship, to analyze the functions and limitations of human rights vocabularies. Therefore, we will discuss the philosophical foundation of various human rights theories, its criticism and challenges, the different solutions and its dilemma.
The goals of this course is to help students:
(a) to realize the basic content of human rights concept.
(b) to realize the positive and negative statements of different human right conception.
(c) to analyze contemporary human rights theories.
(d) to analyze the interpretation and application of the concept of human rights in dealing with the oppression and dominant issues.
四、課程內容 Course Description
整體敘述 Overall Description
整體而言本課程將處理下列幾個重要議題: 何謂權利? 何謂人權? 如何認知哪些權利為人權? 關於人權的基本主張如何被證成?如何理解壓制現象? 壓制現象如何產生? 如何辦別壓制與被壓制者? 何謂結構性壓制? 如何處理在種族、性別、階級等不同結構性不正義對個人所造成的壓迫或支配? 人權語彙(rights talk)的潛能與局限。

此授課大綱為暫定稿,詳細進度與書單將於開學第一週確定
●分週敘述 Weekly Schedule
週次 Wk 日期 Date 課程內容 Content 備註 Note

1

9/9 請假   

2

9/16 第一週 世界人權宣言及其歷史重要性
討論主題
1.世界人權宣言出現的歷史背景?
2.條文內容引發的爭議?
3.後續國際人權規範的發展
Mary Ann Glendon (2001), A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (New York: Random House, 2001)
Glendon, Mary Ann. A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1st ed. New York: Random House, 2001, pp. 172-91, 73-8, 235-41.
陳瑤華 (二版)(2015),《人權不是舶來品》,五南,第一、二章。
Paul Gordon Lauren (2003), The Evolution of International Human Rights, Chapter 7
參考資料:
Ignatieff, Michael (2001), “The Attack on Human Rights”, Foreign Affairs, 80 (6), 102-116
Rieff, David (1999), “The Precarious Triumph of Human Rights”, New York Times Magazine, 8 August 1999.
世界人權宣言 http://www.tahr.org.tw/index.php/categories/tw/data/
《公民及政治權利國際公約》http://www.tahr.org.tw/site/data/cp.htm
《經濟社會文化權利國際公約》http://www.tahr.org.tw/site/data/esc.htm
  

3

9/23 第二週 什麼是「權利」?
討論主題
1. 權利的性質:消極權利或積極權利? 道德權利或法律權利?
2. 權利,目標與福利的區別
3. 意志論與利益論對權利的證成
Hart, L.A “Are There Any Natural Rights?”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 151-162.
Raz, Joseph, “On the Nature of Rights”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 44-60.
Feinberg, “The Nature and Value of Rights”, The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 174-186.
參考資料
Campbell Tom, 2006, Ch 1-3
Wenar, Leif “Rights” in Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights
  

4

9/30 第三週 什麼是「權利」?
討論主題
1. 權利的性質:消極權利或積極權利? 道德權利或法律權利?
2. 權利,目標與福利的區別
3. 意志論與利益論對權利的證成
Hart, L.A “Are There Any Natural Rights?”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 151-162.
Raz, Joseph, “On the Nature of Rights”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 44-60.
Feinberg, “The Nature and Value of Rights”, The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 174-186.
參考資料
Campbell Tom, 2006, Ch 1-3
Wenar, Leif “Rights” in Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights
  

5

10/7 第四週 什麼是「人權」?
討論主題
1.何謂人權
2.人權與自然權利
3.人權與人性尊嚴
Cranston, Maurice: What are Human Rights? I-III
Henkin, Louis: The Rights of Man Today,第一章
Charles Beitz, “Human Rights as a Common Concern,” American Political Science Review, 95 (June 2001), pp. 269-82.
參考資料
Griffin, James, First Steps in an Account of Human Rights, European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2001): 306-327.
Pogge, Thomas, How Should Human Rights Be Conceived? in Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (Polity Press, 2008)
Dershowitz Alan(2004), Rights from Wrongs: A Secular Theory of the Origins of Rights; chapters 1-8
  

6

10/14 第五週 存在著不同種類的人權?
討論主題
1.人權有種類的不同?
2.社會、經濟權利是人權嗎?
3.哪一種人權更優先或更根本?
Maurice Cranston, “Human Rights, Real and Supposed” in The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 163-173.
Shue, H. Basic Rights, 35-64.
Kenneth Roth, “Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization,” Human Rights Quarterly 26 (Feb., 2004), pp. 63-74
參考資料:
陳瑤華(2014)〈監督機制〉,收於《聯合國人權兩公約》,台北:台灣聯合國研究中心與財團法人台灣新世紀文教基金會,23-56。
  

7

10/21 第六週 人權的虛與實
討論主題:
1.人權真的存在嗎?
2.人權是一種「神話」嗎?
3.人權全球治理是問題還是解答?
Stamos, David N. (2013), The Myth of Universal Human Rights, Rouledge, Introduction, 1-26.
MacIntyre, A. (1989), Some Consequences of the Failure of the Enlightenment Project, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 172-180.
參考資料:
Nickel, James (2006), Making Sense of Human Rights (2nd),Backwell Publishing.
Harman, G. (1989), “Moral Relativism As a Foundation for Natural Rights”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 148-151.
  

8

10/28 第七週 人權的理論證成
討論主題
1.如何決定人權的內容及範圍?
2.人權的理論基礎在何在?
3.人權需要理論的基礎嗎?
Gerwirth, Alan (1989), “The Basis and Content of Human Rights”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 181-201.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1989), “Capabilities and Human Rights”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 212-230.
參考資料
Stamos, David N. (2013), The Myth of Universal Human Rights, Rouledge, 27-47.
  

9

11/4 第八週 人權的倫理
討論主題
1.人權在維護什麼樣的價值?
2.人權的倫理基礎
3.人權與哲學
Williams, B. (1999), “In the Beginning Was the Deed”, in Deliberative, Democracy and Human Rights, Yale University, 49-60.
Scarry, E. (1999), “On Philosophy and Human Rights”, in Deliberative, Democracy and Human Rights, Yale University, 71-80.
參考資料
Nino, Carlos S. (1991) The Ethics of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 第一章。
  

10

11/11 第九週 人權與結構性壓迫
討論主題:
1. 人權與人害
2. 制度性的壓迫與支配
2. 國際、物種的不正義
Young, Iris M. (1990), “Five Faces of Oppression.” In Justice and Politics of
Difference, 39-65,Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum Martha(2006), Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Harvard University Press(中譯本:韋伯出版社)
參考資料
Young, Iris M. (2001), “Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgments of Injustice”, in Journal of Political Philosophy, 9: 1-18
Cudd, Ann (2006), “Oppression: The Fundamental injustice of Social Institutions”, in Analyzing Oppression: 3-27; Oxford University Press.
  

11

11/18 第十週 人權是普遍的嗎?
討論主題
1.何謂普遍性?
2.如何證成普遍性?
3.跨文化對話途徑
American Anthropological Association: Statement on Human Rights, Winston (ed), 116-120
The Dalai Lama (2002), “Human Rights and Universal Responsibility”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 291-297.
Teson, Ferdinand “International Human Rights & Cultural Relativism” in The Philosophy of Human Rights, Belmont California: Wardsworth Publishing Company, 379-396
參考資料
Stamos, David N. (2013), The Myth of Universal Human Rights, Rouledge, 第三章,48-98.

  

12

11/25 第十一週「亞洲價值」的論辯
討論主題
1.「亞洲價值」論辯興起的背景
2.什麼是「亞洲價值」?
3.「亞洲價值」與例外主義?
Li , Xiarong (2001), “ ‘Asian Values’ and the Universality of Human Rights” in , 397-408
Chen, Jau-hwa (2008), “Aisa Values, Why Not? But How?” in Human Rights in Asia, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 41-62.
Mab Huang: Debating Asian Values: Saying Too Little or Saying Too Much?
參考資料
陳瑤華 (二版)(2015),《人權不是舶來品》,五南,第三章。
  

13

12/2 第十二週 人權來自文化的真空?
討論主題
1.人權基礎論是一種過時的理論?
2.文化根源與文化本質主義
3.人權與文化的關係
Rorty, R. (2001), “Human Rights, Rationality and Sentimentality”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 241-257.
Heiner Bielefeldt (2000)"Western" Versus "Islamic" Human Rights Conceptions? A Critique of Cultural Essentialism in the Discussion on Human Rights”, in Political Theory, Vol. 28, No. 1 (Feb., 2000), 90-121.
http://insct.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Beilefelt.2000.Cultural-Relativism-Critique.pdf
參考資料
*An-Na'im Abdullahi Ahmed(ed) (1992) Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press(中譯本:韋伯出版社) Chs.1 & 5, Conclusion
  

14

12/9 第十三週 跨文化的人權價值
討論主題
1.不同文化的人權溯源
2.溯源的對與錯
3.人權的文化根源不能問?
Wiredu, Kwasi (2001), “An Akan Perspective on Human Rights”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 298-314.
An Na’im, Abdullahi (2001), “Human Rights in the Muslim World”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 298-314.
參考資料
Stamos, David N. (2013), The Myth of Universal Human Rights, Rouledge, 第四、五章,99-176.
  

15

12/16 第十四週 儒家的人道價值與人權
討論主題
1.哪些儒家的價值支持人權?
2.中國的民主運動與人權
3.人道價值與人權
Paltemaa, Lauri (2008), “Human Rights from the Left: The Early Chinese Democracy Movement”, in Human Rights in Asia, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 63-82.
Kent, Ann (2008), “Chinese Values and Human Rights”, in Human Rights in Asia, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 83-98.
參考資料
W.T. de Bary, Asian Values and Human Rights: A Confucian Communitarian Perspective, (1998) (中譯本:商周出版社), Chs.1 & 2
  

16

12/23 第十五週人權與性別(不)正義
討論主題
1. 性別作為一種結構
2. 性侵害與種族屠殺
3. 人權與女權
Human Rights Watch (1996), Shattered Lives: Sexual violence During the Rwandan Genocide and its Aftermath, New York: Human Rights Watch.
Bunch, Charlotte (1990), “Women’s Rights as Human Rights: Toward a Re-Vision of Human Rights,” Human Rights Quarterly 12:4 (Nov. 1990), pp. 486-498.
參考資料
Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women, at www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its causes and consequences, Ms. Radhika Coomaraswamy, “Cultural Practices in the Family that are Violent towards Women,” E/CN.4/2002/83, (esp. paragraphs 12-20), at
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G02/104/28/PDF/G0210428.pdf?OpenElement
  

17

12/30 第十六週 人權與文化(不)正義
討論主題
1. 何謂少數民族文化的正義
2. 人權與族裔文化正義
3. 何謂「集體的權利」?
Kymlicka, Will (2001), "The Good, the Bad and the Intolerable: Minority Group Rights," in in The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 445-461.
“United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,” 13 September 2007,
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
參考資料
Crawford, J. (2001), “the Rights of Peoples: ‘Peoples’ or Government’?”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights, ST. Paul: Paragon House, 427-444.
  

18

1/6 第十七週 「轉型」如何重塑人權
討論主題
1.什麼是「轉型的正義」?
2.處理過去人權侵害的困境
3.轉型正義作為人權的新學門
Arthur, Paige, (2009), “How ‘Transitions’ Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice” in Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009): 321-367.
參考文獻
Mutua, M. (2015), “What is the Future of Transitional Justice?” in International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2015, 9, 1–9
  
五、考評及成績核算方式 Grading
配分項目 Items 次數 Times 配分比率 Percentage 配分標準說明 Grading Description
出席 20%本課程要求每一位同學必須積極參與課堂討論.屢次缺席者,學期分數將扣20%.
報告 40%學期繳交一份期末報告,同時在學期中必須繳交期末報告題目
課堂討論 20%每一週上課前,每一位同學都必須針對該週上課的主題,提出一個問題,並上傳至教學網頁中,以作為上課討論的基礎
 320%口頭報告
配分比率加總 100%  
六、授課教師課業輔導時間和聯絡方式 Office Hours And Contact Info
●課業輔導時間 Office Hour
星期二:15:10-17:00
星期四:13:10-15:00
●聯絡方式 Contact Info
研究室地點 Office:D804 EMAIL:jhchen@scu.edu.tw
聯絡電話 Tel:28819471#6232 其他 Others:
七、教學助理聯絡方式 TA’s Contact Info
教學助理姓名 Name 連絡電話 Tel EMAIL 其他 Others
八、建議先修課程 Suggested Prerequisite Course
九、課程其他要求 Other Requirements
十、學校教材上網及教師個人網址 University’s Web Portal And Teacher's Website
學校教材上網網址 University’s Teaching Material Portal:
東吳大學Moodle數位平台:http://isee.scu.edu.tw
教師個人網址 Teacher's Website:
其他 Others:
十一、計畫表公布後異動說明 Changes Made After Posting Syllabus
This seminar will provide graduate students with an advanced introduction to the study of
human rights, covering key debates in history, law, philosophy, political science,
international relations, social science, and critical theory.

The course will examine cutting-edge research on topics including:
the origins of human rights; the concept of human dignity; the
nature and grounds of human rights; the relationship between human rights
morality and law; the legality and morality of humanitarian intervention
; the feasibility and claimability of human rights; contemporary
criticisms of human rights; human rights and the accommodation of diversity
; and the future of human rights.